Speed without direction
Teams generate more artefacts while the underlying problem, evidence, and decision remain weak.
The Augmented Designer Framework™
A human-governed operating system for design organisations that need AI-enabled velocity without losing quality, judgment, trust, or craft.
Build the executive case ↘01 · The proposition
TADF closes the operating gap between individual AI experimentation and an accountable, measurable design practice.
Teams generate more artefacts while the underlying problem, evidence, and decision remain weak.
Every designer uses different tools, prompts, review habits, and thresholds for acceptance.
AI-supported decisions become difficult to trace, challenge, govern, or explain to stakeholders.
Tool fluency grows while research judgment, critique, ethics, and strategic craft risk erosion.
What changes after adoption
Who uses it first
Locate the work, choose the right agent, practise the required skill, and retain ownership at the checkpoint.
Start with the work →Set practice standards, assess capability, govern risk, run pilots, and connect design quality to measurable impact.
Build the case →Six connected layers
Each layer answers a different leadership question. Together they move TADF from publication to enterprise adoption system.
Why TADF exists, who it serves, and what changes after adoption.
Explore →02Business impact, organisational risk, differentiation, and expected outcomes.
Explore →03Nine stages, ownership boundaries, quality gates, agents, and artefacts.
Explore →04Skills, maturity, role pathways, heatmaps, and learning plans.
Explore →05Readiness, a 30/60/90 roadmap, pilot playbook, leadership, and measurement.
Explore →06Research, claims, validation status, limitations, and framework versions.
Explore →Adoption pathways
Use the open framework, process, skills, agents, and source library.
Explore framework →Baseline the work, select two high-value stages, run governed checkpoints, and measure the change.
View pilot playbook →Establish governance, role pathways, learning plans, maturity reporting, and sustained quality monitoring.
View capability model →The strategic position